<![CDATA[Lexicanum Forums - All Forums]]> http://forum.lexicanum.com/ Thu, 23 Feb 2012 07:20:36 +0000 MyBB <![CDATA[Recent Occurances / Aktuelles / Dernièrement]]> http://forum.lexicanum.com/showthread.php?tid=576 Wed, 15 Feb 2012 18:37:28 +0000 http://forum.lexicanum.com/showthread.php?tid=576 This thread is for collection news about the Lexicanum-Network, GW, etc... I ask the admins to update the Main Page(s) when necessary!

25. February: Warhammer 40.000 celebrates its 25th anniversary!
14. February: Lexicanum reached 1000 "Likes" on Facebook.
??. February: The german lexicanum celebrates its 100.000.000 page access


(Of course everyone can post news here... the admins have to decide which ones are important...)]]> This thread is for collection news about the Lexicanum-Network, GW, etc... I ask the admins to update the Main Page(s) when necessary!

25. February: Warhammer 40.000 celebrates its 25th anniversary!
14. February: Lexicanum reached 1000 "Likes" on Facebook.
??. February: The german lexicanum celebrates its 100.000.000 page access


(Of course everyone can post news here... the admins have to decide which ones are important...)]]> <![CDATA[Display: Portalboxes/ summary]]> http://forum.lexicanum.com/showthread.php?tid=574 Sun, 22 Jan 2012 10:17:19 +0000 http://forum.lexicanum.com/showthread.php?tid=574
I've got a display problem with my templates:

[Image: mini_273258Clipboard02.jpg]

Here the InfoTab_Mondes-Template

Is it possible to keep the Portal-Boxes + Infobox (Worlds) + Summary in the same place without this display crash?]]>
I've got a display problem with my templates:

[Image: mini_273258Clipboard02.jpg]

Here the InfoTab_Mondes-Template

Is it possible to keep the Portal-Boxes + Infobox (Worlds) + Summary in the same place without this display crash?]]> <![CDATA[Ultramarines = Quotes]]> http://forum.lexicanum.com/showthread.php?tid=573 Sat, 21 Jan 2012 16:26:22 +0000 http://forum.lexicanum.com/showthread.php?tid=573
are the Lyrics of the track 14 from the Film "ultramarines" quotable?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eTwg5KAjOjI

Quote:"From Ancient Terra the Emperor commands His Proud Sons."

"From revered Blood-stock these Warriors are made His Proud sons"

"No fear they shall know as Adeptus Astartes, His Proud Sons"

"Humanity's foes they defend against all, His Proud Sons"

"Warrior Elite, Unbreakable spirit, Astartes"

"Supreme Defenders, Unchallenged in Battle Astartes"

"Warrior Elite, Unbreakable spirit, Astartes"

"Courage and honor, Emperor and Primarch, Astartes!"
]]>
are the Lyrics of the track 14 from the Film "ultramarines" quotable?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eTwg5KAjOjI

Quote:"From Ancient Terra the Emperor commands His Proud Sons."

"From revered Blood-stock these Warriors are made His Proud sons"

"No fear they shall know as Adeptus Astartes, His Proud Sons"

"Humanity's foes they defend against all, His Proud Sons"

"Warrior Elite, Unbreakable spirit, Astartes"

"Supreme Defenders, Unchallenged in Battle Astartes"

"Warrior Elite, Unbreakable spirit, Astartes"

"Courage and honor, Emperor and Primarch, Astartes!"
]]> <![CDATA[What is the background-color of Lexicanum?]]> http://forum.lexicanum.com/showthread.php?tid=557 Mon, 16 Jan 2012 16:38:34 +0000 http://forum.lexicanum.com/showthread.php?tid=557
What is the background-color for standard text of the Lexicanum? I tried all grey-tones but none matched. It's definitely darker than Grey51 and brighter than Grey41.

http://wh40k.lexicanum.de/wiki/Lexicanum...xRRGvnQeUl]]>
What is the background-color for standard text of the Lexicanum? I tried all grey-tones but none matched. It's definitely darker than Grey51 and brighter than Grey41.

http://wh40k.lexicanum.de/wiki/Lexicanum...xRRGvnQeUl]]> <![CDATA[Kategorie/Liste für Hörbücher]]> http://forum.lexicanum.com/showthread.php?tid=556 Mon, 16 Jan 2012 16:31:50 +0000 http://forum.lexicanum.com/showthread.php?tid=556 <![CDATA[Equipment/Armoury Lists]]> http://forum.lexicanum.com/showthread.php?tid=538 Sat, 14 Jan 2012 22:41:58 +0000 http://forum.lexicanum.com/showthread.php?tid=538 *List of Space Marine equipment - http://wh40k.lexicanum.com/wiki/List_of_...xH-dPmcedk
*Witch Hunters Armoury - http://wh40k.lexicanum.com/wiki/Witch_Hu...xIATPmcedk
are organised around gameplay mechanics rather than background (SM one has weapons divided by 1-hand/2-hand rather than by type and vehicles divided by elite/fast attack/support etc).
Obviously these will need changed, but I thought it would be a good idea to standardise all such lists to the same type of format.

I recently created "Adepta Sororitas Equipment (List) " http://wh40k.lexicanum.com/wiki/Adepta_S...xH9dvmcedk
and wondered if other users thought this would be a good format to use.

The I used layout is as follows -

*Weapons
- divided into
**Close Combat Weapons
**Ranged Weapons (Basic) - for boltguns, pistols etc
**Ranged Weapons (Heavy) - for heavy and vehicle weapons
**Named Weapons - for character specific weapons (Obv with some lists like the Marines this section would probably be too big and would reuire its own list page)

*Equipment - all miscellaneous wargear

*Vehicles and Vehicle Upgrades

This seperates all equipment into simple categories, but avoids referencing any game mechanics or army lists.
Any thoughts?]]> *List of Space Marine equipment - http://wh40k.lexicanum.com/wiki/List_of_...xH-dPmcedk
*Witch Hunters Armoury - http://wh40k.lexicanum.com/wiki/Witch_Hu...xIATPmcedk
are organised around gameplay mechanics rather than background (SM one has weapons divided by 1-hand/2-hand rather than by type and vehicles divided by elite/fast attack/support etc).
Obviously these will need changed, but I thought it would be a good idea to standardise all such lists to the same type of format.

I recently created "Adepta Sororitas Equipment (List) " http://wh40k.lexicanum.com/wiki/Adepta_S...xH9dvmcedk
and wondered if other users thought this would be a good format to use.

The I used layout is as follows -

*Weapons
- divided into
**Close Combat Weapons
**Ranged Weapons (Basic) - for boltguns, pistols etc
**Ranged Weapons (Heavy) - for heavy and vehicle weapons
**Named Weapons - for character specific weapons (Obv with some lists like the Marines this section would probably be too big and would reuire its own list page)

*Equipment - all miscellaneous wargear

*Vehicles and Vehicle Upgrades

This seperates all equipment into simple categories, but avoids referencing any game mechanics or army lists.
Any thoughts?]]> <![CDATA[Boxes' templates and Display]]> http://forum.lexicanum.com/showthread.php?tid=518 Sat, 07 Jan 2012 12:37:29 +0000 http://forum.lexicanum.com/showthread.php?tid=518
a technical question about the page display/ placement of the boxes:

Example

- how to get all the Portal-templates up right on the page fixed
(which mean for all the different articles to find thoses boxes on the same place)

+ without this "hole" between title / Spoiler+disambiguation boxes...?]]>
a technical question about the page display/ placement of the boxes:

Example

- how to get all the Portal-templates up right on the page fixed
(which mean for all the different articles to find thoses boxes on the same place)

+ without this "hole" between title / Spoiler+disambiguation boxes...?]]> <![CDATA[Background Errors]]> http://forum.lexicanum.com/showthread.php?tid=517 Sat, 07 Jan 2012 06:26:22 +0000 http://forum.lexicanum.com/showthread.php?tid=517
I've been getting a partially white background colour on the site and the buttons for editing, discussion, history etc... seem to be missing. Does anybody know anything about this?

.png  Screen.png (Size: 294.48 KB / Downloads: 5) ]]>
I've been getting a partially white background colour on the site and the buttons for editing, discussion, history etc... seem to be missing. Does anybody know anything about this?

.png  Screen.png (Size: 294.48 KB / Downloads: 5) ]]> <![CDATA[Copying French template code in the English lex]]> http://forum.lexicanum.com/showthread.php?tid=516 Thu, 05 Jan 2012 08:15:54 +0000 http://forum.lexicanum.com/showthread.php?tid=516 As you may be aware, several of the space marine infobox templates in the English lex were affected by the recent update. Myself and a couple of other users have taken a look at them, and in attempting to 'jury-rig' fixes until someone with more markup knowledge takes a look at them, we noticed that the French equivalents were pretty cool.

As an experiment, I've copied the French code for Later Founding Chapters, and it can be seen used on the English lex at the moment. I guess I'm asking for opinions about this; do we like using the same code as the French site, shall we keep it, should we use all the French template coding as standard etc.
Thanks.]]> As you may be aware, several of the space marine infobox templates in the English lex were affected by the recent update. Myself and a couple of other users have taken a look at them, and in attempting to 'jury-rig' fixes until someone with more markup knowledge takes a look at them, we noticed that the French equivalents were pretty cool.

As an experiment, I've copied the French code for Later Founding Chapters, and it can be seen used on the English lex at the moment. I guess I'm asking for opinions about this; do we like using the same code as the French site, shall we keep it, should we use all the French template coding as standard etc.
Thanks.]]> <![CDATA[Page Layout problems (02/01/12)]]> http://forum.lexicanum.com/showthread.php?tid=515 Mon, 02 Jan 2012 04:42:57 +0000 http://forum.lexicanum.com/showthread.php?tid=515 <![CDATA[Space Marine Pages]]> http://forum.lexicanum.com/showthread.php?tid=514 Sun, 01 Jan 2012 05:14:01 +0000 http://forum.lexicanum.com/showthread.php?tid=514
Each page will now adhere to this format -
*Portal Box
*Lede (Lead paragraph - a brief desciption)
*Chapterbox
*All other info (Everything else)
*Related Articles (the list links, plus page specific info)
*Sources

I have removed "Stub" tags from most of the articles - almost all the stub tags were placed on pages where the chapter was only mentioned in a single source - so no more information would ever be available (unless GW happen to revive the chapter with more background).
"Stub" tags only have a practical application on pages where it is possible to add more info - on a Space Marine Chapter page where the chapter is only mentioned in passing they serve no purpose other than to clutter up the page.

Any queries etc can be sent to my user page, thanks.]]>
Each page will now adhere to this format -
*Portal Box
*Lede (Lead paragraph - a brief desciption)
*Chapterbox
*All other info (Everything else)
*Related Articles (the list links, plus page specific info)
*Sources

I have removed "Stub" tags from most of the articles - almost all the stub tags were placed on pages where the chapter was only mentioned in a single source - so no more information would ever be available (unless GW happen to revive the chapter with more background).
"Stub" tags only have a practical application on pages where it is possible to add more info - on a Space Marine Chapter page where the chapter is only mentioned in passing they serve no purpose other than to clutter up the page.

Any queries etc can be sent to my user page, thanks.]]> <![CDATA[Server maintenance on 30th December 2011]]> http://forum.lexicanum.com/showthread.php?tid=513 Fri, 30 Dec 2011 18:41:54 +0000 http://forum.lexicanum.com/showthread.php?tid=513 It took me quite a while to figurew out how to migrate out skin/layout, so the German 40k-Lex had some layout issues over the da. Sorry for that. Smile

Also, I installed an improved cache system, which should improve the overall site performance. We will see if that actually works... ^^ (The performance situation over the holidays was unacceptable.)

Please report any problems which might occurr after the update here.

*** IMPORTANT NOTICE regarding DynamicPageList ***
The DynamicPageList Addon was updated and the Wiki-Code is NOT compatible with the old one. This means, that all pages using the DynamicPageList function must be updated!

Here is a documentation how to use the updated function:
http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:...ection#Use

The update was necessary since the old Addon-version contained some severe security issues.]]> It took me quite a while to figurew out how to migrate out skin/layout, so the German 40k-Lex had some layout issues over the da. Sorry for that. Smile

Also, I installed an improved cache system, which should improve the overall site performance. We will see if that actually works... ^^ (The performance situation over the holidays was unacceptable.)

Please report any problems which might occurr after the update here.

*** IMPORTANT NOTICE regarding DynamicPageList ***
The DynamicPageList Addon was updated and the Wiki-Code is NOT compatible with the old one. This means, that all pages using the DynamicPageList function must be updated!

Here is a documentation how to use the updated function:
http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:...ection#Use

The update was necessary since the old Addon-version contained some severe security issues.]]> <![CDATA[Lexicanum nicht erreichbar]]> http://forum.lexicanum.com/showthread.php?tid=512 Thu, 29 Dec 2011 10:13:34 +0000 http://forum.lexicanum.com/showthread.php?tid=512 <![CDATA[The Lexicanum is incredibly slow (II)]]> http://forum.lexicanum.com/showthread.php?tid=511 Tue, 27 Dec 2011 22:38:11 +0000 http://forum.lexicanum.com/showthread.php?tid=511
Two days ago the servers of sphaerentor and all the three lexis were down, without any warning or explaination. Now it come again but it is steal very slow.
--> What did happen? Is it possible in a not- far future to avoid such problems? (in case of a non-expected maintenance on the server)

Did I missed something?]]>
Two days ago the servers of sphaerentor and all the three lexis were down, without any warning or explaination. Now it come again but it is steal very slow.
--> What did happen? Is it possible in a not- far future to avoid such problems? (in case of a non-expected maintenance on the server)

Did I missed something?]]> <![CDATA[Lexicanum-Battles of the Imperium/IG/SM]]> http://forum.lexicanum.com/showthread.php?tid=510 Fri, 23 Dec 2011 20:05:41 +0000 http://forum.lexicanum.com/showthread.php?tid=510 What I'm asking is, why are there not battles, say from the Gaunt's Ghosts Series, or the Ultramarines Omnibus, Space Wolves, Storm of Iron by Graham McNeill? Yes, given that these battles have changed the course of history in the Imperium, why are these from the Codexes, and not from the wide range of Lore and Novels that fill the Libraries? It would be interesting to have these up as well, would one think?]]> What I'm asking is, why are there not battles, say from the Gaunt's Ghosts Series, or the Ultramarines Omnibus, Space Wolves, Storm of Iron by Graham McNeill? Yes, given that these battles have changed the course of history in the Imperium, why are these from the Codexes, and not from the wide range of Lore and Novels that fill the Libraries? It would be interesting to have these up as well, would one think?]]> <![CDATA[Bilder werden nicht alle geladen]]> http://forum.lexicanum.com/showthread.php?tid=509 Wed, 21 Dec 2011 21:00:47 +0000 http://forum.lexicanum.com/showthread.php?tid=509 Alle anderen Bilder sind korrekt.

Wenn ich versuche, das Bild mit Firefox direkt zu laden, erscheint:
Fehler: Datei nicht gefunden
Die Dateien unter http://wh40k.lexicanum.de/mediawiki/imag...ons-V2.jpg konnten nicht gefunden werden.


Und das Bild Datei:Remiare-1.jpg wird im Artikel nur als senkrechter Strich dargestellt, ist aber in der Ansicht als hochgeladenes Bild korrekt.]]> Alle anderen Bilder sind korrekt.

Wenn ich versuche, das Bild mit Firefox direkt zu laden, erscheint:
Fehler: Datei nicht gefunden
Die Dateien unter http://wh40k.lexicanum.de/mediawiki/imag...ons-V2.jpg konnten nicht gefunden werden.


Und das Bild Datei:Remiare-1.jpg wird im Artikel nur als senkrechter Strich dargestellt, ist aber in der Ansicht als hochgeladenes Bild korrekt.]]> <![CDATA[Space Wolf Apothecary's]]> http://forum.lexicanum.com/showthread.php?tid=508 Sun, 18 Dec 2011 21:43:29 +0000 http://forum.lexicanum.com/showthread.php?tid=508 <![CDATA[Portal Miniaturen]]> http://forum.lexicanum.com/showthread.php?tid=507 Sun, 18 Dec 2011 09:57:27 +0000 http://forum.lexicanum.com/showthread.php?tid=507
Das sind alle artikel, die es momentan gibt:

Space Marines (Miniaturen 1. Edition)
Space Marines (Miniaturen 2. Edition)
Space Marines (Miniaturen 3. Edition)
Space Marines (Miniaturen 4. Edition)
Space Marines (Miniaturen 5. Edition)
Miniaturen:Legion of the Damned
Miniaturen:_Blood_Angels
Miniaturen: Nemesis-Ritter
Miniaturen:Boss
Miniaturen: Bigmek (Warhammer 40.000)
Miniatur:Terminatoren
Miniaturen:Boss
Miniaturen:Kampfpanza
Miniaturen:Yarrick
Miniaturen: Bigmek (Warhammer 40.000)
Miniaturen: Eldar
Miniaturen: Kampfpanza (Warhammer 40.000)


Auch die Seiten hier sind nicht gerade der Hammer, der Terminatoren-Artikel etwa behandelt ausdrücklich nur Chaosterminatoren und der Eldar-Artikel hat gerade mal ein Bild.

Vorschläge:
1. Statt auf Miniaturenartikel auf die Bilderkategorien verlinken (die guten Artikel, z.B Space Marines 1. Edition kommen natürlich trotzdem ins Portal)

2. Das Portal ausweiten: Es werden nicht nur Miniaturen, sondern Tabletop allgemein behandelt. Im Prinzip ist das ja jetzt schon der Fall, weil in der Fahndungsgesuche-Liste auch GW-Mitarbeiter verlinkt werden.
Folgende Kategorien kann man dann damit abdecken:

Kategorie:Tabletop
Kategorie:Hauptspiel
Kategorie:Nebenspielsysteme
Kategorie:Spielbegriffe
Kategorie:Spielutensilien
Kategorie:Modellbau
Kategorie:Bemalung
Kategorie:Games Workshop


Was meint ihr?]]>
Das sind alle artikel, die es momentan gibt:

Space Marines (Miniaturen 1. Edition)
Space Marines (Miniaturen 2. Edition)
Space Marines (Miniaturen 3. Edition)
Space Marines (Miniaturen 4. Edition)
Space Marines (Miniaturen 5. Edition)
Miniaturen:Legion of the Damned
Miniaturen:_Blood_Angels
Miniaturen: Nemesis-Ritter
Miniaturen:Boss
Miniaturen: Bigmek (Warhammer 40.000)
Miniatur:Terminatoren
Miniaturen:Boss
Miniaturen:Kampfpanza
Miniaturen:Yarrick
Miniaturen: Bigmek (Warhammer 40.000)
Miniaturen: Eldar
Miniaturen: Kampfpanza (Warhammer 40.000)


Auch die Seiten hier sind nicht gerade der Hammer, der Terminatoren-Artikel etwa behandelt ausdrücklich nur Chaosterminatoren und der Eldar-Artikel hat gerade mal ein Bild.

Vorschläge:
1. Statt auf Miniaturenartikel auf die Bilderkategorien verlinken (die guten Artikel, z.B Space Marines 1. Edition kommen natürlich trotzdem ins Portal)

2. Das Portal ausweiten: Es werden nicht nur Miniaturen, sondern Tabletop allgemein behandelt. Im Prinzip ist das ja jetzt schon der Fall, weil in der Fahndungsgesuche-Liste auch GW-Mitarbeiter verlinkt werden.
Folgende Kategorien kann man dann damit abdecken:

Kategorie:Tabletop
Kategorie:Hauptspiel
Kategorie:Nebenspielsysteme
Kategorie:Spielbegriffe
Kategorie:Spielutensilien
Kategorie:Modellbau
Kategorie:Bemalung
Kategorie:Games Workshop


Was meint ihr?]]> <![CDATA[PHP: Height]]> http://forum.lexicanum.com/showthread.php?tid=506 Tue, 13 Dec 2011 14:13:49 +0000 http://forum.lexicanum.com/showthread.php?tid=506
Es geht um dieses Vorlage hier : die Bilder sind oft zu hoch]]>
Es geht um dieses Vorlage hier : die Bilder sind oft zu hoch]]> <![CDATA[Randomhouse/Heyne verlinkt auf uns]]> http://forum.lexicanum.com/showthread.php?tid=505 Wed, 07 Dec 2011 13:44:08 +0000 http://forum.lexicanum.com/showthread.php?tid=505 http://www.randomhouse.de/book/series.js...04&men=506

Nicht schlecht für ein inoffizielles Projekt.

Zum Vergleich: bei Perry Rhodan und den beiden Battletech-Reihen machen sie das nicht.]]> http://www.randomhouse.de/book/series.js...04&men=506

Nicht schlecht für ein inoffizielles Projekt.

Zum Vergleich: bei Perry Rhodan und den beiden Battletech-Reihen machen sie das nicht.]]>